Two ways to work with us. We run the Cursor rollout for your team: project rules, MCP servers and Agent guardrails, so every engineer gets the same output. Or we place a Cursor engineer from our bench on your team in 2 to 4 weeks, from $60,000 a year, with a 90-day replacement guarantee.
Free 30-min call · No pitch, no slides
Cursor is the fastest path from prompt to working code, and most teams already have it installed. But installing it is not the same as getting real output from it. Engineers fall back to autocomplete, the Agent makes confident edits across the wrong files, and there is no shared standard for how the team should actually use it. The tool is powerful; the workflow around it is missing.
We are a Cursor development agency, not a prompt-tips newsletter. One engineer builds a fleet of rules, workflows, and MCP integrations that make Cursor understand your codebase, follow your conventions, and ship changes your team trusts. You get a setup where the AI editor accelerates real work instead of generating cleanup.
Cursor makes it easy to start and hard to standardize. The individual wins you get on day one rarely turn into consistent, trustworthy output across a whole team and codebase.
Without scoped rules and context, Cursor Agent and Composer confidently rewrite files they should not touch, ignore your patterns, and produce diffs you spend more time reviewing than writing. We constrain the agent with real guardrails.
One engineer prompts well, another fights autocomplete, and there is no agreed way to use Cursor on your code. We codify project rules, conventions, and review practices so the whole team gets consistent results.
Cursor is only as good as what it can see. Without MCP servers and proper indexing, it misses your docs, schema, tickets, and internal tools. We wire that context in so suggestions reflect your actual system.
One engineer runs the whole lifecycle, from a single developer's setup to a governed, codebase-aware Cursor workflow your whole team ships with confidently.
Multi-file refactors, feature scaffolds, and repetitive engineering tasks designed as repeatable Cursor Agent and Composer flows, scoped, reviewable, and reliable instead of one-off prompts.
We author .cursorrules and rules files that encode your stack, conventions, and constraints so Cursor follows your patterns by default, not the generic ones it ships with.
We build and connect MCP servers so Cursor can read your docs, database schema, issue tracker, and internal tools, turning generic suggestions into context-aware engineering.
Indexing strategy, prompt patterns, and automations tuned to your actual repository so Cursor understands your architecture and stops fighting your conventions.
We do not just hand your team a license. Every Cursor setup we deliver is mapped to your codebase, codified into rules, and rolled out with standards before it becomes how your team ships.
How your team codes and where Cursor stalls
Workflow blueprint & output projection
Project rules, MCP plan, and context strategy
Cursor rules & integration map
Agent flows, MCP servers, and guardrails
Live, governed Cursor workflows
Rule updates, rollout, and team enablement
Ongoing standards & enablement protocol
More prompt tips will not fix an inconsistent workflow. You need a partner who understands both your codebase and Cursor's internals, from rules files to MCP and agent guardrails.
A senior engineer runs a fleet of Cursor Agent and Composer flows tuned to your codebase, so your whole team gets the standards without hiring a platform team to build them.
Scoped agents, guardrails, and review practices built in. Cursor accelerates real shipping instead of generating diffs you have to clean up.
We connect MCP servers and your real context so Cursor reasons about your actual system, not a generic template of one.
Rules, MCP servers, and docs live in your repo. Your team keeps the output and the standards, no dependence on a single power user.
Book a strategy call and we will map how your team codes, where Cursor stalls, and the rules, MCP servers, and agent workflows that turn it into real output.
In this call, we'll walk through your project scope, timeline, and goals - so we can both check if we're a fit. No obligation, no slide deck, just a working session.
Share how your team uses Cursor today, then schedule the call on this page.
Choose a time for your free 30-minute strategy call. Live availability is shown in your timezone.
In this call, we?ll walk through your project scope, timeline, and goals?so we can both check if we?re a fit. No obligation, no slide deck, just a working session.
Don?t want a call? Email info@manasflow.com
Book NowOne connected approach, from the first workflow to a company that runs smarter.
Built around your business. Powered by ManasFlow.Built with the tools your team already knows
Book your free 30-minute strategy call. Choose an available date and time in your timezone.
Your calendar opens here. You can also open the booking page or email us.
Before we build
Practical answers about scope, delivery, ownership, and working with ManasFlow.
Yes, remotely. Rollouts run over video calls and in your repository, and placed engineers join your team as remote members.
Yes. We author rules files that encode your stack, conventions, and constraints so Cursor follows your patterns by default. This is usually the single biggest jump in output quality for a team.
Yes. We build and connect MCP servers so Cursor can read your docs, database schema, issue tracker, and internal tools, turning generic completions into context-aware engineering grounded in your system.
We scope the Agent and Composer with rules, clear context, and review practices so changes stay constrained to the right files and follow your conventions, instead of confident rewrites you have to undo.
Yes. We codify standards, build shared rules and MCP integrations, and run enablement so every engineer gets consistent results instead of only the one power user who prompts well.
Yes. We keep rules current as your codebase evolves, update MCP integrations, and enable new engineers so Cursor stays a reliable part of how your team ships.
Because the standards, rules, and MCP servers are built once as a repeatable fleet, not re-explained per engineer. One senior engineer maintains the system that the whole team draws on.
Cursor is strong at multi-file edits, refactors and scaffolding inside an existing repo, because Agent and Composer read the files you point them at. It struggles when context is missing: no rules file, no schema, no docs. Then it writes code that compiles but ignores your conventions. Most rollout work closes that gap.
A rollout covers four things: project rules that encode your stack and conventions, MCP servers that connect Cursor to your docs, schema and tickets, scoped Agent and Composer workflows for repeat tasks, and enablement so every engineer works from the same setup. Everything lives in your repo, so it survives staff changes.
Yes. Through Engineer Placement we place an engineer from our own bench on your team in 2 to 4 weeks, from $60,000 a year, with a 90-day replacement guarantee and no recruitment fee. Choose placement when you have ongoing work. Choose a rollout when you need the setup built once.
A freelancer usually tunes one person's setup. An in-house hire needs weeks of recruiting before any work starts. We build the shared rules, MCP servers and review practices once, in your repo, for the whole team, then hand them over or keep maintaining them.
Skip it for changes you cannot review: large migrations without tests, security-critical auth code with no second reviewer, or a repo Cursor cannot index. In those cases we add tests and guardrails first, or keep the task manual. More AI edits on untested code only add review load.
Cursor for editing, MCP servers for context, your existing CI for checks, and Claude Code or Codex when a task suits a terminal or CI agent better than the editor. We pick per task and document the choice in your repo, so the team knows which tool to reach for.