All Tools

Staffing Model Calculator

Compare in-house hiring vs staff augmentation vs outsourcing for AI talent with full cost analysis.

FreeNo credit cardInstant resultsNo signup required

Role and delivery assumptions

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does in-house hiring seem so expensive upfront?

Recruiting, onboarding, ramp-up, and management overhead add 40-50% to salary cost in year 1. Over time (2-3 years), this amortizes and hiring becomes cheapest. Staff augmentation has higher monthly cost but spreads recruiting cost across many clients. Think of it as: recruiting cost ($25K) divided by months worked (12) = $2K/month tax on hiring.

When does hiring break even vs. staff augmentation?

Typically 16-20 months for senior engineers. Before that, staff augmentation is cheaper monthly. After that, hiring's fixed salary cost beats the augmentation's 40-50% markup. Use this calculator to find your specific break-even point based on your team composition.

Is outsourcing always the cheapest option?

Cheapest per hour, yes. But total cost is often higher due to communication overhead (10-20%), rework cycles, management overhead, and hidden inefficiency. Outsourcing works best for commodity work or overflow capacity. For core strategic work, quality matters more than cost, making hiring or augmentation better choices.

What if we hire but the employee leaves in year 2?

Turnover cost is real: recruiting ($25K) + onboarding ($4K) + ramp-up ($12K) + lost productivity ≈ $41K. Our calculator models 10% annual turnover into calculations. To reduce turnover: offer competitive salary (top 50th percentile), career growth, good management, and strong culture fit.

How do we handle ramp-up inefficiency in practice?

Expect: first 4 weeks at 30-40% productivity (learning systems), weeks 5-8 at 60-70%, weeks 9-12 at 85-90%, week 13+ at 100%. Don't plan on full productivity for the first quarter. Good onboarding and mentorship reduce ramp-up time by 20-30%.

What's the difference between "staff augmentation" and "outsourcing" in this calculator?

Staff augmentation means the person works on your team and you manage them directly. Outsourcing means the vendor manages the team and you manage the vendor relationship. Augmentation offers better integration but higher cost. Outsourcing is cheaper but has lower control and higher communication burden.

Can we switch models mid-project (e.g., hire after 6 months of augmentation)?

Yes, many companies do this successfully. Hire contractors for 6 months to validate the work, then convert top performers to full-time. This reduces hiring risk. Cost is similar to hiring directly but with augmentation overhead for 6 months. The benefit is reduced recruitment risk since you can skill-test before commitment.

Want expert help implementing this?

Turn the opportunities in your results into a practical plan with ManasFlow.

Book a free strategy call